1982 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (135 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 111 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda 929 | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 929 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2710 mm |