1982 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1972 Seat 124
To start off, 1982 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 124 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1972 Seat 124. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1972 Seat 124. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 160 kg more than 1972 Seat 124. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mazda Cosmo (149 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Seat 124. (90 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1982 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Seat 124.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda Cosmo | 1972 Seat 124 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | Cosmo | 124 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |