1982 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1999 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1999 Ford Windstar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1982 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mazda Cosmo | 1999 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Cosmo | Windstar |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3066 mm |