1982 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Volvo S40

To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S40 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Volvo S40 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (320 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Mazda Cosmo 2005 Volvo S40
Make Mazda Volvo
Model Cosmo S40
Year Released 1982 2005
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1769 cc 2520 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 93 HP 218 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 320 Nm
Drive Type Rear AWD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1090 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2650 mm