1982 Mercedes-Benz 190 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1982 Mercedes-Benz 190. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercedes-Benz 190. (165 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercedes-Benz 190 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | 190 | UTE |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |