1982 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2001 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2001 Mercury Villager is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 3,276 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Villager weights approximately 445 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mercury Villager has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mercury Villager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercedes-Benz E | 2001 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
| Model | E | Villager |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 3276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |
