1982 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz E has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercedes-Benz E | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E | CLK |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |