1982 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia Optima weights approximately 114 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercedes-Benz E | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Kia |
Model | E | Optima |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1454 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2795 mm |