1982 Mercedes-Benz S vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz S would be higher. At 3,839 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mercedes-Benz S (201 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 665 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mercedes-Benz S (315 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.

Compare all specifications: