1982 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2004 Chevrolet Prizm
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Prizm is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T weights approximately 266 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Prizm.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Prizm, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Chevrolet Prizm has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Chevrolet Prizm will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercedes-Benz T | 2004 Chevrolet Prizm | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
Model | T | Prizm |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |