1982 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercedes-Benz T | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | T | S60 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2720 mm |
