1982 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercedes-Benz T | 2010 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Audi |
| Model | T | A3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2578 mm |
