1982 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 578 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercedes-Benz T | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | T | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1934 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2748 mm |
