1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercedes-Benz W 123 Coupe | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | W 123 Coupe | 6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2789 mm |