1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1982 Mercury Cougar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mercury Cougar (91 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 815 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mercury Cougar (164 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1982 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
Model | Cougar | Fronte |
Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 164 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2060 mm |