1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 1970 Seat 1500
To start off, 1982 Mercury Cougar is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mercury Cougar (91 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1970 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1970 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 155 kg more than 1970 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 1970 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Mercury | Seat |
Model | Cougar | 1500 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |