1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Mercury Cougar is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 598 kg more than 1981 Seat Ritmo.
Because 1982 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Mercury | Seat |
Model | Cougar | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 882 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2460 mm |