1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 770 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cougar | Minica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2350 mm |