1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2001 Rover 75 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rover 75 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1982 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 2001 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Cougar | 75 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |