1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 230 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cougar | Colt |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2970 mm |