1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 266 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Cougar. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Cougar. (164 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercury | Holden |
Model | Cougar | UTE |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2301 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |