1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 211 kg more than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2012 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mercury | Dodge |
Model | Cougar | Ram |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3560 mm |