1982 Mercury Cougar vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 2 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Cougar | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Mercury | Mini |
Model | Cougar | Countryman |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1996 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2595 mm |