1982 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1983 Pininfarina Coupe
To start off, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe (125 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Because 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Pininfarina Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis (262 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe. (176 Nm). This means 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Pininfarina Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1983 Pininfarina Coupe | |
Make | Mercury | Pininfarina |
Model | Grand Marquis | Coupe |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 262 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2450 mm |