1982 Mercury Lynx vs. 1987 Zastava Yugo
To start off, 1987 Zastava Yugo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mercury Lynx (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (108 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1982 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercury Lynx | 1987 Zastava Yugo | |
| Make | Mercury | Zastava |
| Model | Lynx | Yugo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1372 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 67.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 48 L |
