1982 Mercury Lynx vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 510 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Lynx | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Mercury | Westfield |
Model | Lynx | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2320 mm |