1982 Mercury Lynx vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 520 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercury Lynx | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Lynx | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 100 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 59 L |
