1982 Mercury Lynx vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 72 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C3 (147 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mercury Lynx | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Mercury | Citroen |
Model | Lynx | C3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1022 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 45 L |