1982 Mercury Lynx vs. 2011 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2011 Renault Symbol is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Symbol (97 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Symbol weights approximately 50 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Symbol (127 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2011 Renault Symbol will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercury Lynx | 2011 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Lynx | Symbol |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 97 HP |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2473 mm |
