1982 Mini Clubman vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1982 Mini Clubman.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1982 Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1982 Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mini Clubman | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Mini | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Clubman | E |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 298 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4698 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2015 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1402 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2760 mm |
