1982 Mini MK IV vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 388 kg more than 1982 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mini MK IV | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mini | Renault |
Model | MK IV | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 612 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2590 mm |