1982 Mini MK IV vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1982 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1982 Mini MK IV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Scion tC (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Scion tC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mini MK IV | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Mini | Scion |
Model | MK IV | tC |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |