1982 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Celeste | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2850 mm |
