1982 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1960 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 20 kg more than 1960 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1960 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Celeste | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2290 mm |
