1982 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2005 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2005 Skoda Octavia is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 310 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2005 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
Model | Celeste | Octavia |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2580 mm |