1982 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2010 Audi A8
To start off, 2010 Audi A8 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A8 weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2010 Audi A8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi A8 has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi A8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2010 Audi A8 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | Celeste | A8 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5192 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3073 mm |
