1982 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2010 Honda Pilot
To start off, 2010 Honda Pilot is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Pilot is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Pilot weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Pilot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Honda Pilot has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Honda Pilot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2010 Honda Pilot | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Honda |
| Model | Celeste | Pilot |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1977 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4849 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1994 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1847 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2774 mm |
