1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 690 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Colt | 6C |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1938 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3010 mm |
