1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1950 Triumph Roadster
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Roadster would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Triumph Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Triumph Roadster weights approximately 353 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1950 Triumph Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Triumph Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 1950 Triumph Roadster | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
| Model | Colt | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1163 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2390 mm |
