1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1983 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1983 Opel Rekord is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,979 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Opel Rekord weights approximately 253 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1983 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 1983 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
Model | Colt | Rekord |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1183 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2740 mm |