1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2004 Subaru Forester is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Forester weights approximately 610 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
| Model | Colt | Forester |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2530 mm |
