1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Grand Am weights approximately 592 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Colt | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 3392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1402 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2810 mm |