1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Rover 75

To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 75 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Mitsubishi Colt 2006 Rover 75
Make Mitsubishi Rover
Model Colt 75
Year Released 1982 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1597 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 74 HP 175 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 930 kg 1230 kg
Vehicle Length 4120 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2390 mm 2750 mm