1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Camry weights approximately 280 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Camry (267 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | Camry |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2999 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 267 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 905 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2730 mm |