1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 621 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Colt | HHR |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1431 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4475 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1603 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2629 mm |
