1982 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Colt | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2640 mm |