1982 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,244 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 29 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Triumph |
Model | Lancer | Herald |
Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 841 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2330 mm |