1982 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1994 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 230 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | 1994 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Lancer | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2440 mm |