1982 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 795 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Lancer | Orlando |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2760 mm |