1982 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (237 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jaguar |
Model | Lancer | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2909 mm |